TOWN
OF ROCKY HILL
BOARD
OF EDUCATION
SPECIAL
MEETING OF
Members
Present: Neil Geldof
Jennifer
Viggiano-Grosse
Nadine
Bell
Peter
Arico
Mark
Carberry
Charles
McMonigle
Rene
Rivard
Anne
Schmidt
Catherine
Vargas
Members
Absent: None
The special meeting of the Board of
Education was held on
Pledge
of Allegiance
The pledge of allegiance was recited.
Chairman Geldof turned the meeting over
to the Finance Committee Chairperson, Mrs. Schmidt.
Mrs. Schmidt asked Dr. Vautour for
responses to informational requests made by the Board at the last meeting.
Response
to Information Requests made at January 31, 2006 meeting
Dr. Vautour provided the following
responses to informational requests made at the last budget session:
Items
remaining to be considered are the FLES program ($36,520) and the Strings
program. Dr. Vautour said since the last
meeting he conferred with the Rocky Hill Education Foundation who indicated
they are setting as a goal for the foundation’s ball supplying the requisite
supplies and materials to initiate a strings program. That would take $6,670 out of the budget. He
also conferred with the Hartt School of Music who indicated they have graduate
assistants who work with districts on a contract basis. The Hartt School of Music does not establish
the fee structure; that is something that is done between the district and the
graduate assistant. He believes they had
experience with
Dr. Vautour
suggested if the Board is interested in continuing the consideration of the
strings program, they leave in the budget the factor of a .45 FTE associated
with salary and provide him an opportunity to confer again with the Hartt
School of Music with an eye towards coming in well below the .45 cost. As soon as he receives the information he
would share it with the Board and they could make a determination as to whether
there is an adjustment they want to make to the budget as submitted to the Town
Council.
This concluded Dr. Vautour’s report and
Mrs. Schmidt said Board members would ask questions beginning with FLES.
With regard to the FLES program. Dr. Vautour said if you were to go to a third
grade only implementation of FLES at a cost of $36,520, you would realize a
reduction of about $35,000. Mrs. Schmidt
asked if the plan is for two hours per day, per school, with instruction time
of 15 minutes per class. Dr. Vautour
said yes. If the Board were to finalize
the discussion items that occurred last week, we would be looking at a reduction
of $235,180. If you went to a modified
FLES implementation schedule, the reduction would move to $340,480. Mrs. Schmidt said in looking at all programs,
she is not sold on 15 minutes a day for world languages.
Mrs. Tina Lionetti asked if starting
FLES in third grade includes keeping it in 6th grade. Dr. Vautour
said, no. Mrs. Lionetti asked if there
was a breakdown of the cost for 6th grade. Dr. Vautour said, yes. Mrs. Lionetti asked if
in 6th grade it would be more than just 15 minutes day. Dr. Vautour said, yes. Mrs. Lionetti said but the cost would be a lot
more. Mrs. Vargas said $26,840.
Mr. Rivard asked, and Dr. Vautour
confirmed, that it hasn’t been decided yet which language would be used for
this program. Mr. Rivard asked, and Dr.
Vautour confirmed, that what administration would be trying to do is open up a
foreign language to students to make them interested. Mr. Rivard asked, and Dr. Vautour confirmed,
that we are presently offering two languages plus Latin in the schools. Mr. Rivard asked if it wouldn’t it make sense
if we were to implement a program like this that both languages be offered so
that when students have a choice of taking French or Spanish they will already
have had exposure. Dr. Vautour said we
might be treating the elementary program similar to what 6th grade
currently experiences which is an exposure to both. Mr. Rivard likes the concept, but wonders
whether we should have a better handle on what it is we want to offer. Dr. Vautour said FLES can be revisited it in
future years, it’s not the first time it’s been considered.
Mrs. Viggiano-Grosse’s concern is that
if FLES is started in third grade and next year we have a tight budget and
can’t implement it in the fourth grade, there’s a huge gap where they’ve been
exposed to it in third grade and not followed up until 6th. She and Mr. Carberry wondered why not start in
the higher grade and work your way down instead of up, then there will be no
huge gap in case we can’t implement it next year in fourth and fifth grade.
Mrs. Vargas said if you are going to
implement it in the younger grades like we did the math program this Board will
need to commit to the future that if started in the third grade we have to
continue to commit to implementing it over the next couple of years. We can’t stop.
Mrs. Schmidt can see it both ways
because we already have an established program in the upper grade levels to add
it downward does get you out of the problem of if we were faced with a
difficult budget year.
Mr. McMonigle is not sure about $36,000
for 15 minutes a day. He likes the
concept but it will get more expensive and doesn’t know if it’s worth it.
Mrs. Vargas asked which list it is on. Dr. Vautour said it was on the cut list. Everyone agreed.
With regard to the Lead Teachers. It was agreed that Lead Teachers was put on
the cut list.
With regard to the Keyboarding Program. Mrs. Bell thinks they need to step back a
little and reassess when would be the best time and where it should be fit into
the curriculum, perhaps in elementary school in the current library/media
time. She suggested it be looked at it
in the upcoming year.
Mrs. Vargas believes if elementary
school children are required to type a report (which she said she believes they
are required by rubric at some point in elementary school) it would be the time
to start to do something as far as keyboarding.
Starting in 6th grade is rather late. She would like to step back and look at how
this fits in the curriculum.
Mrs. Schmidt asked if there is
curriculum mapping that would involve technology skills like keyboarding at the
high school, getting into the computer essentials course. Mrs. Boutilier said one of the components of
the curriculum mapping is to identify in whatever course we’re teaching how
technology is integrated into that course and what is required of the
students. The problem is we are three
years away from being done with the curriculum mapping.
Mrs. Schmidt asked if technology
component doesn’t have its own curriculum mapping. Mrs. Boutilier said no. Dr. Vautour felt the questions raised
warrants administration revisiting this topic from the vantage point of the
number of years that we offer computers and if we’re moving to requirement in
some fashion into a lower grade how it will impact the computer essentials
course. There may be some implications
in terms of existing staff. If they are
not teaching as many sections of computer essentials they may be freed up to do
work in keyboarding. The impact of adjusting
a course at a lower level and its ramifications on a course at the upper level
requires further study.
Discussion took place as to the amount
of money being cut from the budget if keyboarding and FLES are removed. Mr. Turansky directed everyone to Page 51
which shows the total for FLES in the elementary schools as $118,980 plus
$22,840 for the middle school position.
Mrs. Schmidt said, so the whole amount is $141,820. Mrs. Vargas asked about keyboarding and if
the $37,750 is for the .55. Mr. Turansky
said it is for a .55 for salary and all the fringe benefits. Dr. Vautour said with regard to the
keyboarding teacher, no adjustment to the budget was made because it was put on
the reconsider list, so any action taken this evening is going to have to be
for the full amount of that position.
With regard to the Strings Program. Mr. Geldof said in light of tonight’s
discussion some gifts have been found that may mitigate the costs, and
recommended keeping strings. Mrs.
Schmidt disagreed. Do we have any idea
of the potential range for hourly costs?
Dr. Vautour said most likely it will be lower than the $26,020
associated with the .45 position. Mrs.
Schmidt asked why it is $26,020. She
said $57,100 (the entire position) minus $37,750 (for .55 of the salary and all
of the benefits) leaves $19,350. Mr.
Turansky said also remaining is supplies and equipment. Dr. Vautour said the .45 as originally
calculated was $26,020 it was .45 of salaries plus supplies and equipment. Mrs. Schmidt said which are going with the
Foundation. Dr. Vautour said right. We would be looking at something near
$20,000.
Mrs. Vargas said on Page 52, equipment
and materials is only $5,890, and we have $780 for curriculum development. She didn’t think the Foundation would pay for
curriculum development. Mrs. Schmidt
suggested just rounding the amount to $20,000.
Dr. Vautour said if you put a $20,000 figure for contracted services,
you would be taking $6,020 as a reduction.
Mr. Geldof said $20,000 for that page.
Mrs. Schmidt said the reduction is $43,770. Dr. Vautour said right.
With regard to Textbooks. Mr. Arico said middle school history is being
reduced. Dr. Vautour said the initial
amount was $37,000 for two books. Mrs.
Bell would like to recommend putting back all the textbooks because we got
really behind over the years and it took forever to catch up and feels we
should not loose ground again. Mr. Arico
agreed. Mr. Rivard would like to back
that up because textbooks, aside from teachers, are the spine of the
classroom. Mr. Geldof said we have
$76,600 for textbooks and are in agreement to keep them. Mrs. Bell said right. Mrs. Vargas said the curriculum development
that goes along with it.
A break was taken.
Upon returning from break,
MOTION by Mr. Rivard, seconded by Mr. Arico, to amend the
Superintendent’s budget proposal as follows:
Cut the Assistant Principal positions, $99,700; remove Accreditation
process, $3,600; remove FLES, $141,820; adjust staffing at Stevens School to
accommodate a Third Grade class, $57,100; remove additional costs associated
with a Third Grade at Moser School, $3,255; remove Special Education
Placeholder, $30,000; remove the Data Clerk, $$11,154; adjustment for
Consolidation of Supplies, $2,541; remove keyboarding, $72,880; make adjustment
for the Strings Program, $43,770; adjust Professional Development, $10,000;
adjustment in Field Trips, $6,410; and remove the Adaptive PE, $11,420. This will make a total budget reduction of
$493,650 of the Superintendent’s original request of $2,082,015, resulting in a
revised budget submission of $24,657,992, which is a net increase of $1,588,365,
or 6.88% increase.
FAVOR: ALL
MOTION CARRIED
Mrs. Schmidt thanked everyone for time,
efforts and consideration and thanked Board members for their hard work.
MOTION by Mrs. Vargas, seconded by Mrs. Schmidt, to adjourn
the budget workshop at
FAVOR: ALL
MOTION
CARRIED
Respectfully submitted,
Juanda J. Simons
Recording Secretary
Accepted by: ________________________